I may be the first to come up with this terrible neologism, but the time for it is certainly at hand. There have been a number of high-profile incidents where the security of stuff that was connected to the Internet was neglected in the rush to get it connected, or highly dubious design decisions were made in order to get an IoT “thing” to market.
The term originally came up when I was discussing this widget with a friend of mine. The NodeMCU boards are pretty sweet, and are based on the ESP-8266, which is also pretty sweet. The motor driver chip they used is from the 1970s, and there are far better ones available. The VNH2SP30 is a beast, and can supply 10x the current of the L293D, although you’d need two of them for dual motors, so there may be a horses for courses argument to be made there.
The DDoS that took out Krebs On Security, though, doesn’t really have a similar argument going for it. IoT security is hard because the devices don’t have a great interface for users to tighten up their security settings (if indeed, they have any security settings), and users don’t expect to have to tighten up the security of their appliances. As a result, insecure IoT stuff just kind of hangs out in dubious parts of the web, waiting for someone to make it a questionable offer of employment.
To the people who make things incomplete, weak, or insecure, I dedicate this new word:
IoTiot noun, informal
- A person or company that creates IoT devices lacking security, solid design, or even a purpose, usually in order to make a quick grab for cash.
- Any such device, once it starts behaving as it was designed (which is to say “badly”).
Similarly: IoTiotic, IoTiots, IoTiocy
I seem to have left a ground connection off the PCB, which causes the 3.3v regulator to not work. I’ve fixed it in the PCB design in the repository, but the DirtyPCBs order link goes to a product that doesn’t work, so I still have to fix that.
Since I’m going to have to do a new version of the PCB anyway, I’ve added a blinky light on one of the IO pins so that I can have an additional channel for debug information.
I’ve ordered the second version of the swarm control boards. If you want some, you can get them here, but I advise against doing so until after a post shows up here saying either that they work, or that they’re busted.
In the mean time, I’ve been realizing that the boards are good for all sorts of stupid tricks. For instance, you can control people using galvanic vestibular stimulation, which uses 1-1.5mA at pretty low voltages (More academic version, more hacking). Since the swarm control boards already use a 3.7v lithium cell, additional voltage regulation isn’t needed (if anything, they may be too weak), and PWM can be used to control the current. A resistor in series might also be good, in case of… errors.
The same board could also be connected to a door latch, or magnetic strike, which would let a user connect to a web page (the ESP8266 can serve web pages and act as an AP) and put in a password to open the door. Lockitron appears to be making a business out of selling this, but the mechanics are cheaper.
Given that there’s also an I2C bus on the device, IO expanders, sensors, and other goofiness could be added to make wearables that respond to the environment, smart dust sensors, IoT nodes for home automation, scales that tweet about how much you weigh, etc. IoT is the new black! It’s a floor wax! It’s a dessert topping!